Pediatric extracorporeal life support for refractory status asthmaticus: ELSO Registry trends from the past decade.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for status asthmaticus (SA) is rare. Increased safety and experience may increase utilization of ECLS for SA. METHODS: We reviewed pediatric (<18 years old) patients requiring ECLS for SA between 1998 and 2019 within the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry and Nemours Children's Health (NCH) system. We compared patient characteristics, pre-ECLS medications, clinical data, complications, and survival to discharge between Early (1988-2008) and Late (2009-2019) eras. RESULTS: From the ELSO Registry, we identified 173 children, 53 in Early and 120 in Late eras, with primary diagnosis of SA. Pre-ECLS hypercarbic respiratory failure was similar between eras (median pH 7.0 and pCO2 111 mm Hg). Venovenous mode (79% vs. 82%), median ECLS time (116 vs. 99 h), time to extubation (53 vs. 62 h), and hospital survival (89% vs. 88%) also remained similar. Intubation to cannulation time significantly decreased (20 vs. 10 h, p = 0.01). ECLS without complication occurred more in the Late era (19% vs. 39%, p < 0.01), with decreased hemorrhagic (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.05) and noncannula-related mechanical (19% vs. 6%, p = 0.008) complications. Within NCH, we identified six Late era patients. Pre-ECLS medication favored intravenous beta agonists, bronchodilators, magnesium sulfate, and steroids. One patient died from neurological complications following pre-ECLS cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: Collective experience supports ECLS as a rescue therapy for pediatric SA. Survival to discharge remains good, and complication rates have improved. Pre-ECLS cardiac arrest may potentiate neurologic injury and impact survival. Further study is needed to evaluate causal relationships between complications and outcomes.

Treatment of pain with intranasal fentanyl in pediatric patients in an acute care setting: a systematic review.

AIM: The primary objective of this review is to provide an updated, comprehensive overview on the efficacy of intranasal fentanyl (INF) for acute pain relief in the pediatric population. METHODS: Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Instructions for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we were able to screen articles based on key words to reach a final number of 10 studies. RESULTS: All but one study showed that INF was efficacious for pain relief in this select pediatric population. CONCLUSION: It is evident that INF is efficacious for analgesia, but other agents should also be considered in this patient population. As a result, further research is needed to investigate the clinically efficacy of INF in an acute care setting for pediatric patients.